ChaWF vs leehonglok: Analysis board • playstrategy.org

10:00

987654321987654321

1C2+20.0C8=5+0.42H2+3+0.3P7+1+0.33C2=7−0.2C2=30.04C7+3?!−0.8...Inaccuracy. The following was best.4.E7+5H8+75.A6+5[...]4...H2+3−0.65C8+4??−4.6...Blunder. The following was best.5.P7+1R1=26.R9+2[...]5...H8+7??−0.8Blunder. The following was best.5...R1=26.H8+76H8+7−0.6P3+1−1.07H7-9?−2.2...Mistake. The following was best.7.R1=2R1=28.R9=8[...]7...H3+4−2.18H9+8−2.1P3+1?!−1.5Inaccuracy. The following was best.8...R1+29P7+1??−3.9...Blunder. The following was best.9.H8+7P3+19...R1=2??−1.7Blunder. The following was best.9...H4-210.H8+610P5+1??−6.7...Blunder. The following was best.10.H8+7A4+510...R2+3−6.811H8+6−8.3C5+3−8.312P7+1−10.6H4+6−10.813H6+8−11.7H6+5−11.514A4+5−14.8H5+3−16.115K5=4−15.2...Red offers draw15...H3+1−14.316H3+5−15.6H7+6−13.417H5+7−21.4H6+7−17.918P9+1?!#−10...Your opponent can now force a win. The following was best.18.H8-7H7+818...H7+8#−1119K4+1#−11R9=8?!−22.3Lost forced winning sequence. The following was best.19...H8-720.K4-1R9+2[...]20P9+1?!#−5...Your opponent can now force a win. The following was best.20.R1+2R8+520...P1+1?!−24.4Lost forced winning sequence. The following was best.20...H8-721.K4-1R8+8[...]21H7+9?!#−5...Your opponent can now force a win. The following was best.21.R1+1H8-721...H1-2?!−28.9Lost forced winning sequence. The following was best.21...H8-722.K4-1R8+8[...]22H8-7−33.7R8+6−29.023P7+1?!#−4...Your opponent can now force a win. The following was best.23.H7+5R2+223...R8=6#−324A5+4#−3R6+1#−225K4=5#−2H2-4#−126K5=6#−1R6+1#−127A6+5#−1R6=5#−328K6-1#−3R2+6#−229E3+5#−2R5-1#−230K6+1#−1R5+1#−131K6+1#−1R2-2

0-1

Checkmate, Black is victorious

FEN

SGF

Download annotated Download raw Embed in your website

(;FF[4] GM[7] CA[UTF-8] AP[playstrategy.org] DT[2025.01.17] EV[Rated Xiangqi tournament https://playstrategy.org/tournament/1wFHfuDl] TM[10+0] PW[ChaWF] PB[leehonglok] RE[0-1] PC[PlayStrategy: https://playstrategy.org/AwamyRyh] GN[ChaWF vs. leehonglok] BR[1606] WR[1088] SZ[10] SU[Standard] ;W[hhhf] ;B[hcec] ;W[hjgh] ;B[gdge] ;W[hfcf] ;B[bccc] ;W[cfcc] ;B[bacc] ;W[bhbd] ;B[hagc] ;W[bjch] ;B[cdce] ;W[chai] ;B[ccde] ;W[aibg] ;B[cecf] ;W[cgcf] ;B[aaba] ;W[egef] ;B[babd] ;W[bgdf] ;B[ecef] ;W[cfce] ;B[deff] ;W[dfbe] ;B[ffeh] ;W[fjei] ;B[ehci] ;W[ejfj] ;B[ciaj] ;W[gheg] ;B[gcfe] ;W[egcf] ;B[fegg] ;W[agaf] ;B[gghi] ;W[fjfi] ;B[iaha] ;W[afae] ;B[adae] ;W[cfae] ;B[ajbh] ;W[becg] ;B[hahg] ;W[cecd] ;B[hgfg] ;W[eifh] ;B[fgfh] ;W[fiei] ;B[bhdg] ;W[eidi] ;B[fhfi] ;W[djei] ;B[fiei] ;W[didj] ;B[bdbj] ;W[gjeh] ;B[eieh] ;W[djdi] ;B[ehei] ;W[didh] ;B[bjbh])

0 1

ChaWF leehonglok

ChaWF −24

5 inaccuracies

1 mistake

3 blunders

56Average centipawn loss

Learn from your mistakes

leehonglok +36

4 inaccuracies

0 mistakes

2 blunders