Wilber vs Jacobwang: Analysis board • playstrategy.org

10:00

987654321987654321

1C2=60.0H8+7+0.22H2+3+0.1C2=4+0.13R1=20.0H2+3+0.34P7+10.0R1=2+0.15H8+70.0R2+40.06R9=8+0.1R2=6?+1.2Mistake. The following was best.6...C8+27.P3+17R2+4+0.9P3+1?!+1.5Inaccuracy. The following was best.7...R6=28.C8=98C8=9+1.4E7+5??+5.9Blunder. The following was best.8...R9+29R8+6??+2.7...Blunder. The following was best.9.H7+6R6+510.H3-4[...]9...P3+1+2.910R2=7?+1.4...Mistake. The following was best.10.H7+6P3=410...H3+4?+2.9Mistake. The following was best.10...R6=311R8=6+3.0A6+5+3.112H7+6+3.2H4+6??+9.8Blunder. The following was best.12...R6+413.R6-113H6+4+9.5H6+7+10.614C9=3+10.4R9=6+11.915H4+3+10.2C4=7+10.516C6=5+8.1C8+4+10.117R7-1?!+5.3...Inaccuracy. The following was best.17.C5+417...R6+7+5.818C3+4+6.3R6-4+7.219C3=5??+2.6...Blunder. The following was best.19.R6=5R6+320.P3+1[...]19...C7+7+2.420K5+1+2.3K5=6+2.521K5=6??0.0...Blunder. The following was best.21.C5=7C8-322.C7-1[...]21...R6+5??+7.3Blunder. The following was best.21...C8+222.K6+1R6+6[...]22A6+5+6.6C8+2+6.923K6+1??+1.7...Blunder. The following was best.23.C5=423...C7-20.024K6-10.0C7+10.025R7=6??#−3...Your opponent can now force a win. The following was best.25.K6+1C8-126.K6-1[...]25...R6+1#−226K6+1#−2C8=5??−2.9Lost forced winning sequence. The following was best.26...C7-127.A5+4R6=427C5=1−2.7R6-2?!−2.0Inaccuracy. The following was best.27...C5-528.R6=5R6=4[...]28E7+5−1.8R6=9−1.629R6+1−1.3R9=6−1.630P3+1??−5.6...Blunder. The following was best.30.C5-230...C7-1?−3.1Mistake. The following was best.30...R6+231.E5-7C5-5[...]31K6-1??−7.7...Blunder. The following was best.31.P3+131...C5=9−6.932P3+1??#−4...Your opponent can now force a win. The following was best.32.R6+3A5-432...R6+1#−333K6-1#−3C7+1#−434R6+1#−1R6+1

0-1

Checkmate, Black is victorious

FEN

SGF

Download annotated Download raw Embed in your website

(;FF[4] GM[7] CA[UTF-8] AP[playstrategy.org] DT[2025.03.04] EV[Rated Xiangqi tournament https://playstrategy.org/tournament/hP84thhj] TM[10+3] PW[Wilber] PB[Jacobwang] RE[0-1] PC[PlayStrategy: https://playstrategy.org/TBDdiaa8] GN[Wilber vs. Jacobwang] BR[1260] WR[1389] SZ[10] SU[Standard] ;W[hhdh] ;B[hagc] ;W[hjgh] ;B[bcdc] ;W[ijhj] ;B[bacc] ;W[cgcf] ;B[aaba] ;W[bjch] ;B[babe] ;W[ajbj] ;B[befe] ;W[hjhf] ;B[cdce] ;W[bhah] ;B[gaec] ;W[bjbd] ;B[cecf] ;W[hfcf] ;B[ccde] ;W[bddd] ;B[faeb] ;W[chdf] ;B[deff] ;W[dffe] ;B[ffgh] ;W[ahgh] ;B[iafa] ;W[fegc] ;B[dcgc] ;W[dheh] ;B[hchg] ;W[cfcg] ;B[fafh] ;W[ghgd] ;B[fhfd] ;W[gded] ;B[gcgj] ;W[ejei] ;B[eafa] ;W[eidi] ;B[fdfi] ;W[djei] ;B[hghi] ;W[didh] ;B[gjgh] ;W[dhdi] ;B[ghgi] ;W[cgdg] ;B[fifj] ;W[didh] ;B[hiei] ;W[ehih] ;B[fjfh] ;W[cjeh] ;B[fhih] ;W[dgdf] ;B[ihfh] ;W[gggf] ;B[gigh] ;W[dhdi] ;B[eiii] ;W[gfge] ;B[fhfi] ;W[didj] ;B[ghgi] ;W[dfde] ;B[fifj])

1 00 10 10 1

Wilber Jacobwang

Wilber −73

1 inaccuracy

1 mistake

8 blunders

139Average centipawn loss

Learn from your mistakes

Jacobwang +91

2 inaccuracies

3 mistakes

4 blunders

115Average centipawn loss

Spectator room