Aleksandra vs chesscomparor: Analysis board • playstrategy.org

987654321987654321

0.0Stockfish 14+HCE
in local browser

1H2+30.0C8=5?!+0.6Inaccuracy. The following was best.1...H8+72.E3+5H2+3[...]2H8+7+0.8H8+7+0.53P7+1+0.5P7+1+0.54P1+1+0.3H2+1+0.55P9+1+0.1R9=8+0.26R1=2+0.2R8+60.07P3+1−0.2P7+1−0.48E3+5−0.7R1+1?!−0.2Inaccuracy. The following was best.8...P7+19.C2=19E5+30.0R1=6+0.410A4+5?!−0.3...Inaccuracy. The following was best.10.E7+5A6+510...C2=3+0.111R9+3?!−0.6...Inaccuracy. The following was best.11.C8+1R8-212.H7+6[...]11...C3+3?!+0.1Inaccuracy. The following was best.11...R8=712.R2=3P3+1[...]12E7+50.0C3-1+0.413H7+60.0H1-3+0.114H6+70.0C5=6?!+0.7Inaccuracy. The following was best.14...C5=315.A5-4R6=4[...]15R9=7?!−0.2...Inaccuracy. The following was best.15.R9=6H3+215...C3=7??+1.8Blunder. The following was best.15...C6=316.C2=1R8+3[...]16H3+4?+0.4...Mistake. The following was best.16.H7-6R6=717.H3+4[...]16...C6=3?+1.8Mistake. The following was best.16...H7+617H7-8+1.8R6+4+1.618H8+9??0.0...Blunder. The following was best.18.H8+6R6=419.R7+4[...]18...C7=5??+2.6Blunder. The following was best.18...C3=619.R7+5E7+5[...]19E5-7??−5.3...Blunder. The following was best.19.R7+4E7+519...C5=8??+1.1Blunder. The following was best.19...R6=720.R7+4R8+1[...]20E3-5??−1.2...Blunder. The following was best.20.R7+4R6=720...C3+7−1.321E5-7−1.3R6=1?!−0.3Inaccuracy. The following was best.21...H3+222E7+5??−2.3...Blunder. The following was best.22.H9-7R1=422...C8=5??−0.4Blunder. The following was best.22...R1-223.R7+5R8=5[...]23E5-7?!−1.0...Inaccuracy. The following was best.23.R2=3C5+323...R1-2−1.024C2-1??−4.3...Blunder. The following was best.24.R7+5R8=524...R1-2−3.825C8=3−4.4E3+5−4.526R7+4?!−6.3...Inaccuracy. The following was best.26.C3=5C5+327.E7+5[...]26...H7+6?!−4.6Inaccuracy. The following was best.26...R8=527.C3=5R5=8[...]27P5+1−5.0C5=2?!−4.0Inaccuracy. The following was best.27...C5=328R7-5?!−5.1...Inaccuracy. The following was best.28.R2=4H6+528...H3+4−4.229C3=2−4.4R8=5−4.130R2=4−4.4H6+7−4.731C2=1−5.7H4+5−5.432R7=8−5.6H5+3−5.633R8+1?!−12.6...Inaccuracy. The following was best.33.C2+7A4+533...R1+8−8.434C1+2−11.0H7-5−7.535C2+7?#−4...Your opponent can now force a win. The following was best.35.C1=735...A4+5?−8.0Lost forced winning sequence. The following was best.35...R5+236.A6+5R1=3[...]36R8+2?#−4...Your opponent can now force a win. The following was best.36.C1=7H5+337.P1+1[...]36...H3-2?!−14.4Lost forced winning sequence. The following was best.36...R5+237.A6+5R1=3[...]37C1+3?!#−6...Your opponent can now force a win. The following was best.37.R4+4R1=338.P1+1[...]37...H2+4?!−18.2Lost forced winning sequence. The following was best.37...R5+238.A6+5R1=3[...]38C1-1?!#−4...Your opponent can now force a win. The following was best.38.R4+1R1=338...H4+2#−639C1=5#−1H2+4

0-1

Checkmate, Black is victorious

FEN

SGF

Download annotated Download raw Embed in your website

(;FF[4] GM[7] CA[UTF-8] AP[playstrategy.org] DT[2025.03.16] EV[Casual Xiangqi game] TM[-] PW[Aleksandra] PB[chesscomparor] RE[0-1] PC[PlayStrategy: https://playstrategy.org/eHcxmwsV] GN[Aleksandra vs. chesscomparor] BR[1500] WR[1190] SZ[10] SU[Standard] ;W[hjgh] ;B[hcec] ;W[bjch] ;B[hagc] ;W[cgcf] ;B[gdge] ;W[igif] ;B[baac] ;W[agaf] ;B[iaha] ;W[ijhj] ;B[hahg] ;W[gggf] ;B[gegf] ;W[gjeh] ;B[aaab] ;W[ehgf] ;B[abfb] ;W[fjei] ;B[bccc] ;W[ajag] ;B[cccf] ;W[cjeh] ;B[cfce] ;W[chdf] ;B[accb] ;W[dfcd] ;B[ecfc] ;W[agcg] ;B[cege] ;W[ghff] ;B[fccc] ;W[cdbf] ;B[fbff] ;W[bfad] ;B[geee] ;W[ehcj] ;B[eehe] ;W[gfeh] ;B[cccj] ;W[ehcj] ;B[ffaf] ;W[cjeh] ;B[heee] ;W[ehcj] ;B[afad] ;W[hhhi] ;B[adab] ;W[bhgh] ;B[caec] ;W[cgcc] ;B[gcfe] ;W[egef] ;B[eebe] ;W[ccch] ;B[cbdd] ;W[ghhh] ;B[hgeg] ;W[hjfj] ;B[fegg] ;W[hiii] ;B[ddef] ;W[chbh] ;B[efcg] ;W[bhbg] ;B[abaj] ;W[iiig] ;B[ggef] ;W[hhha] ;B[daeb] ;W[bgbe] ;B[cgbe] ;W[igid] ;B[bedf] ;W[idie] ;B[dfbg] ;W[ieee] ;B[bgdh])

0 10 1

Aleksandra chesscomparor

Aleksandra

9 inaccuracies

3 mistakes

5 blunders

101Average centipawn loss

Learn from your mistakes

chesscomparor

9 inaccuracies

2 mistakes

4 blunders