Weekly Challenge 168: No Action
Create a study which shows a Lines of Action game sequence which ends in a stalemate. A stalemate in Lines of Action is where one side cannot move and does not have all of their pieces connected.
Adjudication Criteria:
1. Fewest moves (plies) in your game
2. Earliest Entry
Additional Restrictions:
- Put the number of moves (ply) achieved in the forum post
- Do not edit the forum post after posting. This will invalidate your entry
- If the study chapter's moves don't match what is claimed in the forum post then the entry will be invalid
If you wish to improve your study and submit a better entry, please clone your original study into a new one, make changes in the new study and make a new forum post with the details and new study link.
Closing Date: Monday 6th July 1200 UTC+0
Weekly Challenge 168: No Action
110 ply
playstrategy.org/study/s9SVCjax
I just learnt this variant recently, so I am not really that great.
I think this is a stalemate and fits the requirements, sorry if it doesnt :)
Perhaps there will better ways.
32 ply
playstrategy.org/study/RKuyAl01
There should be a third Adjudication Criteria:
1. Fewest moves (plies) in your game
2. Earliest Entry
3. most stones on the board
There could have been an adjudication criteria for most (or fewest) stones on the board, but we'll leave it as an interesting consideration to decide on the optimum number of stones for this challenge.
Feel free to experiment with different amounts of stones on the board!
The Adjudication Criteria will remain unchanged for this challenge.
30 ply
see chapter 3
playstrategy.org/study/SIY7qWUK